What is the EU Taxonomy and why does it matter for the building sector?

What is the EU Taxonomy and why does it matter for the building sector?

The EU Taxonomy is a classification system established by the European Union’s DG FISMA for its sustainable finance strategy to define which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. In the context of the building sector, it provides clear criteria for construction, renovation and building operations that help guide investments toward sustainability and climate goals.   

This framework is especially important for financial institutions as they are required to report how ‘green’ their portfolios are under the EU Green Deal. The challenge today however is that each stakeholder has its own way of implementing the taxonomy. This is not only inefficient as it requires a lot of time and resources; it can also increase the likelihood of greenwashing or green buildings falling through the cracks, as the quality of reporting is not consistent.  

Belgium  is not the only country addressing this issue. Ten European Green Building Councils have joined forces under the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA) to promote a consistent interpretation of the EU Taxonomy across countries. Together with these other European GBCs, BGBC is engaging with the European Commission to improve the clarity, measurability, and simplicity of the EU Taxonomy’s technical screening criteria. More information on can be found on CPEA’s website. 

Why does Belgium need its own EU Taxonomy guidance?

Why does Belgium need its own EU Taxonomy guidance?

BGBC’s members, including Belgian banks brought together by FebelFin, dedicated their time and expertise to develop a standardised national guidance. Building on the European definition of sustainable construction, renovation, and acquisition, the guidance translates the EU Taxonomy’s technical screening criteria into the Belgian context. Clear definitions and simplified regulatory interpretations help establish a shared understanding of what qualifies as a green building, thereby facilitating consistent application by financial institutions.  

This ensures that the EU Taxonomy remains both ambitious and operational, enabling the market to act more effectively in the transition toward a sustainable built environment. 

Who should use this guidance?

Who should use this guidance?

The guidance is intended for any stakeholder who needs to refer to the EU Taxonomy technical criteria to demonstrate that a new construction, renovation, or building ownership can be considered sustainable.  

EU Taxonomy reporting obligations does not apply only to the financial sector; many construction and real estate companies are also affected indirectly through their value chains. Companies that are required to report often rely on partners such as builders and suppliers to meet the EU Taxonomy’s sustainability requirements.  Meanwhile, companies that are not legally required to report may still choose to do so voluntarily in order to communicate their sustainability performance. 

What is the basis and purpose of the guidance tailored to the Belgian context?

What is the basis and purpose of the guidance tailored to the Belgian context?

This guidance is a living document. It is based on the chapters from the formal Delegated Acts that are relevant to the construction and real estate sector. The legal and substantive basis derives from the Climate Delegated Act and the associated Annexes that were published in 2021. Visit the EU Taxonomy Compass for more information. 

It serves as a practical guide to help align building projects in Belgium with the requirements of the EU Taxonomy. It applies to new construction, renovation, and acquisition, and offers detailed guidance for each technical screening criterion. The guidance specifies the type of evidence that should be provided for validation (in the design phase) or verification (as-built). 

The guidance is rooted in real-world application as it is developed in close collaboration with BGBC’s members, that have hands on experience on EU Taxonomy, applicable Belgian best practices, regulations and legislation. 

By providing structured, transparent, and locally adapted guidance, this document aims to make regulatory alignment more accessible while contributing to the broader goal of a sustainable built environment in Belgium. 

How often will the guidance be updated?

How often will the guidance be updated?

The guidance is updated regularly to reflect EU and Belgian regulatory changes, market developments, and feedback from users. Each line of the guidance is marked with a version tracking number, allowing users to follow updates and evolutions over time. 

Who is responsible for maintaining and approving updates? 

Who is responsible for maintaining and approving updates? 

BGBC is the owner of the guidance. Updates are overseen by the BGBC EU Taxonomy Committee, which ensures alignment with European developments through the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA), where BGBC participates in the EU Taxonomy technical committee alongside other GBCs. 

How can users submit feedback and how will it be handled? 

How can users submit feedback and how will it be handled? 

Users can submit questions or feedback via the contact form on the BGBC website by selecting the topic “EU Taxonomy.” Submissions are reviewed and processed by the EU Taxonomy Committee. 

How does feedback influence revisions? 

How does feedback influence revisions? 

Feedback from financial institutions, builders, and other stakeholders is incorporated into revisions to improve clarity, usability, and consistency. Each line of the guidance is marked with a version tracking number, allowing users to follow updates and evolutions over time. 

What is the role of the EU Taxonomy Committee

What is the role of the EU Taxonomy Committee

The creation of an EU Taxonomy Committee further strengthens the robustness and continuity of this Belgian guidance. It reviews and implements feedback from users, keeps the guidance up to date as regulations and market expectations evolve, and ensures coherence with guidances development in other European countries through BGBC’s participation in the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA).  

Who contributed to the creation of this guidance?

Who contributed to the creation of this guidance?

The guidance was drafted thanks to the kind participation of  

AG REAL ESTATE 

Romain Collinet   

DOMICA 

Pieter Kindt   

AG REAL ESTATE 

Nathan Rousseaux   

EMBUILD 

Marie-Lorraine Bareth   

ALIDES 

Kelly Moerman   

ENCON 

Steve Van Den Brandt 

ALIDES 

Arnaud Bossuyt   

ENCON 

Nouri Van Rompaey 

ATENOR 

Julie Willem   

FEBELFIN 

Tom Van Den Berghe   

ATENOR 

Alice Herman   

HEYLEN GROUP 

Jarne Heylen   

BANIMMO 

Sven Dumortier   

HEYLEN GROUP 

Sarah Dierick 

Belfius 

Marie André 

IMMOBEL 

Judith Verhoeven   

Belfius 

Sarah Fialon 

ING 

Lesley Gregoire   

Belgian GBC 

Gilles Vanvolsem 

ING 

Marc Carlier   

BESIX RED 

Laurent Sempot   

ING 

Caroline Mouton 

BNP Paribas Fortis 

Rowena Morrey 

KBC 

Toon Borghgraef 

BOLCKMANS 

Geert Deckers   

MADASTER 

Kevin Richardson   

BOPRO 

Lise Ongena 

RETAIL ESTATE 

Jordy Cousaert   

BPI / UPSI 

Sandra Gottcheiner   

REYNAERS 

Kurt Van Den Bergh   

Buildwise 

Lisa Wastiels 

SECO 

Timothy Bourgois 

Buildwise 

Nicolas Heijmans 

SECO 

Robin Allaer 

Brussels Environment 

Molly Steinlage 

Service Public de Wallonie - Département du Développement Durable 

Gaël Vervoort 

Brussels Environment 

Jennifer Timmermans 

STADIM 

Emma Lien Bertels 

CBRE 

Benoît Cruysmans   

Sureal 

Noémie de Crombrugghe 

Cordeel 

Simon Maillet 

SWECO 

Ine Verniers 

DELOITTE 

Tom Renders   

SWECO 

Thomas Bockelandt   

DELOITTE 

Dimitris Pagonis   

Vlaamse Overheid - Facilitair Bedrijf 

Andriy Bruyninckx 

DEPLASSE 

Simon Deveen 

VUB 

Maarten Cumps   

Drees & Sommer 

Linus Grob 

VUB 

Raf Devos