What is the EU Taxonomy and why does it matter for the building sector?
What is the EU Taxonomy and why does it matter for the building sector?
The EU Taxonomy is a classification system established by the European Union’s DG FISMA for its sustainable finance strategy to define which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. In the context of the building sector, it provides clear criteria for construction, renovation and building operations that help guide investments toward sustainability and climate goals.
This framework is especially important for financial institutions as they are required to report how ‘green’ their portfolios are under the EU Green Deal. The challenge today however is that each stakeholder has its own way of implementing the taxonomy. This is not only inefficient as it requires a lot of time and resources; it can also increase the likelihood of greenwashing or green buildings falling through the cracks, as the quality of reporting is not consistent.
Belgium is not the only country addressing this issue. Ten European Green Building Councils have joined forces under the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA) to promote a consistent interpretation of the EU Taxonomy across countries. Together with these other European GBCs, BGBC is engaging with the European Commission to improve the clarity, measurability, and simplicity of the EU Taxonomy’s technical screening criteria. More information on can be found on CPEA’s website.
Why does Belgium need its own EU Taxonomy guidance?
Why does Belgium need its own EU Taxonomy guidance?
BGBC’s members, including Belgian banks brought together by FebelFin, dedicated their time and expertise to develop a standardised national guidance. Building on the European definition of sustainable construction, renovation, and acquisition, the guidance translates the EU Taxonomy’s technical screening criteria into the Belgian context. Clear definitions and simplified regulatory interpretations help establish a shared understanding of what qualifies as a green building, thereby facilitating consistent application by financial institutions.
This ensures that the EU Taxonomy remains both ambitious and operational, enabling the market to act more effectively in the transition toward a sustainable built environment.
Who should use this guidance?
Who should use this guidance?
The guidance is intended for any stakeholder who needs to refer to the EU Taxonomy technical criteria to demonstrate that a new construction, renovation, or building ownership can be considered sustainable.
EU Taxonomy reporting obligations does not apply only to the financial sector; many construction and real estate companies are also affected indirectly through their value chains. Companies that are required to report often rely on partners such as builders and suppliers to meet the EU Taxonomy’s sustainability requirements. Meanwhile, companies that are not legally required to report may still choose to do so voluntarily in order to communicate their sustainability performance.
What is the basis and purpose of the guidance tailored to the Belgian context?
What is the basis and purpose of the guidance tailored to the Belgian context?
This guidance is a living document. It is based on the chapters from the formal Delegated Acts that are relevant to the construction and real estate sector. The legal and substantive basis derives from the Climate Delegated Act and the associated Annexes that were published in 2021. Visit the EU Taxonomy Compass for more information.
It serves as a practical guide to help align building projects in Belgium with the requirements of the EU Taxonomy. It applies to new construction, renovation, and acquisition, and offers detailed guidance for each technical screening criterion. The guidance specifies the type of evidence that should be provided for validation (in the design phase) or verification (as-built).
The guidance is rooted in real-world application as it is developed in close collaboration with BGBC’s members, that have hands on experience on EU Taxonomy, applicable Belgian best practices, regulations and legislation.
By providing structured, transparent, and locally adapted guidance, this document aims to make regulatory alignment more accessible while contributing to the broader goal of a sustainable built environment in Belgium.
How often will the guidance be updated?
How often will the guidance be updated?
The guidance is updated regularly to reflect EU and Belgian regulatory changes, market developments, and feedback from users. Each line of the guidance is marked with a version tracking number, allowing users to follow updates and evolutions over time.
Who is responsible for maintaining and approving updates?
Who is responsible for maintaining and approving updates?
BGBC is the owner of the guidance. Updates are overseen by the BGBC EU Taxonomy Committee, which ensures alignment with European developments through the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA), where BGBC participates in the EU Taxonomy technical committee alongside other GBCs.
How can users submit feedback and how will it be handled?
How can users submit feedback and how will it be handled?
Users can submit questions or feedback via the contact form on the BGBC website by selecting the topic “EU Taxonomy.” Submissions are reviewed and processed by the EU Taxonomy Committee.
How does feedback influence revisions?
How does feedback influence revisions?
Feedback from financial institutions, builders, and other stakeholders is incorporated into revisions to improve clarity, usability, and consistency. Each line of the guidance is marked with a version tracking number, allowing users to follow updates and evolutions over time.
What is the role of the EU Taxonomy Committee
What is the role of the EU Taxonomy Committee
The creation of an EU Taxonomy Committee further strengthens the robustness and continuity of this Belgian guidance. It reviews and implements feedback from users, keeps the guidance up to date as regulations and market expectations evolve, and ensures coherence with guidances development in other European countries through BGBC’s participation in the Climate Positive Europe Alliance (CPEA).
Who contributed to the creation of this guidance?
Who contributed to the creation of this guidance?
The guidance was drafted thanks to the kind participation of
AG REAL ESTATE | Romain Collinet | DOMICA | Pieter Kindt |
AG REAL ESTATE | Nathan Rousseaux | EMBUILD | Marie-Lorraine Bareth |
ALIDES | Kelly Moerman | ENCON | Steve Van Den Brandt |
ALIDES | Arnaud Bossuyt | ENCON | Nouri Van Rompaey |
ATENOR | Julie Willem | FEBELFIN | Tom Van Den Berghe |
ATENOR | Alice Herman | HEYLEN GROUP | Jarne Heylen |
BANIMMO | Sven Dumortier | HEYLEN GROUP | Sarah Dierick |
Belfius | Marie André | IMMOBEL | Judith Verhoeven |
Belfius | Sarah Fialon | ING | Lesley Gregoire |
Belgian GBC | Gilles Vanvolsem | ING | Marc Carlier |
BESIX RED | Laurent Sempot | ING | Caroline Mouton |
BNP Paribas Fortis | Rowena Morrey | KBC | Toon Borghgraef |
BOLCKMANS | Geert Deckers | MADASTER | Kevin Richardson |
BOPRO | Lise Ongena | RETAIL ESTATE | Jordy Cousaert |
BPI / UPSI | Sandra Gottcheiner | REYNAERS | Kurt Van Den Bergh |
Buildwise | Lisa Wastiels | SECO | Timothy Bourgois |
Buildwise | Nicolas Heijmans | SECO | Robin Allaer |
Brussels Environment | Molly Steinlage | Service Public de Wallonie - Département du Développement Durable | Gaël Vervoort |
Brussels Environment | Jennifer Timmermans | STADIM | Emma Lien Bertels |
CBRE | Benoît Cruysmans | Sureal | Noémie de Crombrugghe |
Cordeel | Simon Maillet | SWECO | Ine Verniers |
DELOITTE | Tom Renders | SWECO | Thomas Bockelandt |
DELOITTE | Dimitris Pagonis | Vlaamse Overheid - Facilitair Bedrijf | Andriy Bruyninckx |
DEPLASSE | Simon Deveen | VUB | Maarten Cumps |
Drees & Sommer | Linus Grob | VUB | Raf Devos |